
Ethics Explainer: Existentialism
ArticleBig Thinkers + Explainers
BY The Ethics Centre 11 DEC 2018
If you’ve ever pondered the meaning of existence or questioned your purpose in life, you’ve partaken in existentialist philosophy.
It would be hard to find someone who hasn’t asked themselves the big questions. What is the meaning of life? What is my purpose? Why do I exist? For thousands of years, these questions were happily answered by the belief your purpose in life was assigned prior to your creation. The existentialists, however, disagreed.
Existentialism is the philosophical belief we are each responsible for creating purpose or meaning in our own lives. Our individual purpose and meaning is not given to us by Gods, governments, teachers or other authorities.
In order to fully understand the thinking that underpins existentialism, we must first explore the idea it contradicts – essentialism.
Essentialism
Essentialism was founded by the Greek philosopher Aristotle who posited everything had an essence, including us. An essence is “a certain set of core properties that are necessary, or essential for a thing to be what it is”. A book’s essence, for example, is its pages. It could have pictures or words or be blank, be paperback or hardcover, tell a fictional story or provide factual information. Without pages though, it would cease to be a book. Aristotle claimed essence was created prior to existence. For people, this means we’re born with a predetermined purpose.
This idea seems to imply, whether you’re aware of it or not, that your purpose in life has been determined prior to your birth. And as you live your life, the decisions you make on a daily basis are contributing to your ultimate purpose, whatever that happens to be.
This was an immensely popular belief for thousands of years and gave considerable weight to religious thought that placed emphasis on an omnipotent God who created each being with a predetermined plan in mind.
If you agreed with this thinking, then you really didn’t have to challenge the meaning of life or search for your purpose. Your God already provided it for you.
Existence precedes essence
While philosophers including Søren Kierkegaard, Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Friedrich Nietzsche questioned essentialism in the 19th century, existentialism was popularised by Jean-Paul Sartre in the mid-20th century following the horrific events of World War II.
As people questioned how something as catastrophically terrible as the Holocaust could have a predetermined purpose, existentialism provided a possible answer that perhaps it is the individual who determines their essence, not an omnipotent being.
The existentialist movement asked, “What if we exist first?”
At the time it was a revolutionary thought. You were created as a blank slate, tabula rasa, and it is up to you to discover your life’s purpose or meaning.
While not necessarily atheist, existentialists believe there is no divine intervention, fate or outside forces actively pushing you in particular directions. Every decision you make is yours. You create your own purpose through your actions.
The burden of too much freedom
This personal responsibility to shape your own life’s meaning carries significant anxiety-inducing weight. Many of us experience the so-called existential crisis where we find ourselves questioning our choices, career, relationships and the point of it all. We have so many options. How do we pick the right ones to create a meaningful and fulfilling life?
“Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does” – John-Paul Sartre
Freedom is usually presented positively but Sartre posed that your level of freedom is so great it’s “painful”. To fully comprehend your freedom, you have to accept that only you are responsible for creating or failing to create your personal purpose. Without rules or order to guide you, you have so much choice that freedom is overwhelming.
The absurd
Life can be silly. But this isn’t quite what existentialists mean when they talk about the absurd. They define absurdity as the search for answers in an answerless world. It’s the idea of being born into a meaningless place that then requires you to make meaning.
The absurd posits there is no one truth, no inherent rules or guidelines. This means you have to develop your own moral code to live by. Sartre cautioned looking to authority for guidance and answers because no one has them and there is no one truth.
Living authentically and bad faith
Coined by Sartre, the phrase “living authentically” means to live with the understanding of your responsibility to control your freedom despite the absurd. Any purpose or meaning in your life is created by you.
If you choose to live by someone else’s rules, be that anywhere between religion and the wishes of your parents, then you are refusing to accept the absurd. Sartre named this refusal “bad faith”, as you are choosing to live by someone else’s definition of meaning and purpose – not your own.
So, what’s the meaning of life?
If you’re now thinking like an existentialist, then the answer to this question is both elementary and infinitely complex. You have the answer, you just have to own it.
Ethics in your inbox.
Get the latest inspiration, intelligence, events & more.
By signing up you agree to our privacy policy
MOST POPULAR
ArticleLifestyle + Health
Vaccines: compulsory or conditional?
ArticleLaw + Human Rights
He said, she said: Investigating the Christian Porter Case
ArticleBeing Human
Free speech has failed us
ArticleBig Thinkers + Explainers
Ethics Explainer: Ethics, morality & law

BY The Ethics Centre
The Ethics Centre is a not-for-profit organisation developing innovative programs, services and experiences, designed to bring ethics to the centre of professional and personal life.
6 Comments
One can make choices about one’s own life and the context in which it unfolds. But one must be humble enough to understand that we are not the centre of the universe but a minuscule part of it. And the universe, as well as our own biology, have its own laws, randomnesses and ways totally independent of our own consciousness.
ReplyExcellent question. In a world without moral compass points, where life’s meaning is left up to the individual to choose, what determines what is ethical or unethical? Is it equally valid to be a saint or a serial killer? So long as you take responsibility for your choices?
In my opinion this is where existentialism breaks down. Even if it is unprovable, there seems to be a moral structure to existence that most cultures and religions agree on, at least broadly. Thinking that the serial killer is living virtuously because he is following a path of his own making is absurd.
ReplyI largely agree with the personal responsibility, as it relates to ethics. Though I do believe it takes a village and sometimes we must depend on the bounds of socioeconomic factors. Or just having a lot of lucky breaks. It depends on the risks we are willing to take, as well. I suppose wisdom and intellect must be filtered in to an extent, too.
It’s about doing the best we can with what we have, to the best of our abilities, not believing that we are predestined to fail. Or to be the very best at something in the whole world.
Most of all, it’s about taking responsibility for our decisions. To me, that means praying the Serenity Prayer backwards: it’s the sorting that comes first, then the courage, and finally the serenity. See takecourage.org for more
ReplyI agree with a lot of the existentialist theory. However, what do they believe with regard to illnesses eg cancer or natural disasters? They emphasise that once we are born, we are responsible for everything, however, if we live a healthy lifestyle (no smoking etc) how can we be responsible for getting cancer?? I would really like to understand this so hopefully someone replies 🙂
ReplyHi Elena. Good question! One of the most important developments in existentialist philosophy is Simone de Beauvoir’s idea of ‘facticity’. De Beauvoir thought that whilst we were radically free, out choices were constrained by the circumstances of our life – particularly because of our bodies. There are some things that limit our ability to freely choose different options. However, existentialists also encourage us not to overstate how much our bodily situation limits our freedom. For instance, whilst we can’t make choices that guarantee we won’t get cancer, we can choose how to respond if we do have a cancer diagnosis. We can let that determine how we live our lives from that point onward, or we can continue to live a life that is ours, despite the diagnosis, or in light of it. We can’t make the cancer go away, but we are free to choose what the diagnosis means for our lives and how we’ll live going forward. That’s the point that existentialists would encourage you to focus on.
Reply
Join the conversation
Have you ever questioned your purpose in life?