
Could a virus cure our politics?
ArticlePolitics
BY Simon Longstaff 27 MAR 2020
The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 will no doubt be remembered for many things.
I wonder if one of the more surprising outcomes will be that our political leaders collectively managed to win back the trust and legitimacy they squandered over the past couple of decades. I hope so – because as we are now seeing in this time of crisis, it really matters.
The past few days have seen Prime Minister Scott Morrison describe panic-shoppers as engaging in behaviour that is “ridiculous” and “un-Australian”. He has had a crack at people who flocked to Bondi Beach in the recent warm weather for not taking seriously the requirements for physical distancing. He is right on both counts. However, his message is blunted by the lack of authority attached to his office. This is part of a larger problem.
The government’s meta-narrative is now one in which responsibility for the nation’s fate is tied to the behaviour of its citizens. The message from our political leaders is clear: ‘You – all of you (the people) – must take responsibility for your choices’.
Again, they are right. It’s just a terrible pity that the potency of the message is undermined by the hypocrisy of the messengers – a group that has refused to take responsibility for pretty much anything – in recent years.
Consider the most recent case of the infamous Sports Rort – in which Government Ministers (including the Prime Minister) offered the ‘Bridget McKenzie’ defence that ‘no laws were broken’. They wriggled and squirmed even further – in an attempt to deflect any and all criticism. Of course, ordinary Australians saw through the evasions and put it all down to political ‘business as usual’.
I recognise that it is unfair to focus on a single incident as indicative of all that has happened to erode trust and legitimacy. McKenzie and Co’s behaviour is just the most recent example of a longer, larger trend. A more equitable reckoning would say to the whole of the political class that we are sick of your blame-shifting, your evasiveness, your self-serving hair-splitting, your back-stabbing, your blatant lies (large and small), your reckless (no, gutless) refusal to accept responsibility for your errors and wrong-doing … your loyalty to the machine rather than to the people whom you are supposed to serve.
The split between ethics and politics was not always so evident. For Ancient Greeks, like Aristotle, each was a different side of a single coin. Ethics dealt with questions about the good life for an individual. Politics considered the good for the life of the community (the polis). The connections were not accidental – they were intrinsic to the understanding of the relationship between people and the communities of which they formed a part. As Umberto Eco once observed, the ancient world was a place of depth populated by heroes. In contrast, we moderns are fascinated by glittering surfaces and find satisfaction in celebrities.
The shallowness of much of modern life has fed into our politics – an arena within which marketing spin too often takes precedence over substance. Some seek to excuse this tendency by saying that our politicians merely reflect the society they represent. It is said that we should demand nothing more of political leaders than what we expect of ourselves. Really? Is that really good enough?
So, how should we respond to this?
Let’s write to our politicians, phone their offices … bombard them with messages of encouragement. Let’s ask them to rise to the occasion – to prove to us (and perhaps to themselves) what they could be.
Let’s appeal to the neglected idealist living buried beneath the callouses. Let’s tell them that they are needed; that they have a noble calling. Let’s enrol them in our dream of a better democracy – one that truly serves the interests of its citizens. Let them be our champions – let them drive out of their ranks anyone who refuses to be and do better.
Let’s imagine what it would be like if, at the end of this year, we were proud of our politicians and the quality of government that they had offered us at a time of crisis.
You can contact The Ethics Centre about any of the issues discussed in this article. We offer free counselling for individuals via Ethi-call; professional fee-for-service consulting, leadership and development services; and as a non-profit charity we rely heavily on donations to continue our work, which can be made via our website. Thank you.
Ethics in your inbox.
Get the latest inspiration, intelligence, events & more.
By signing up you agree to our privacy policy
MOST POPULAR
ArticleLifestyle + Health
Vaccines: compulsory or conditional?
ArticleLaw + Human Rights
He said, she said: Investigating the Christian Porter Case
ArticleBeing Human
Free speech has failed us
ArticleBig Thinkers + Explainers
Ethics Explainer: Ethics, morality & law

BY Simon Longstaff
After studying law in Sydney and teaching in Tasmania, Simon pursued postgraduate studies in philosophy as a Member of Magdalene College, Cambridge. In 1991, Simon commenced his work as the first Executive Director of The Ethics Centre. In 2013, he was made an officer of the Order of Australia (AO) for “distinguished service to the community through the promotion of ethical standards in governance and business, to improving corporate responsibility, and to philosophy.”
3 Comments
I agree with the thrust of the article and really do hope politicians will step up. But the problem of a lack of ethics leading to a lack respect by citizens toward politicians goes back further. Our media is partisan, some left, some right, but none that can be considered balanced. Examples of this include reports riddled with opinion ruining any reliance on the facts in it. Another is quoting (accurately) but leaving out portions of the quote changing the original message. My last example is reporters asking in an election campaign if a politician is going to raise taxes. That is just cheapening the whole process of politicians.
So is that where we have to look for change before we can demand politicians change? No, it goes even further to our whole education system. That is from Kindergarten right through university level. We all know of teachers (I was a secondary teacher) and university lecturers adding their embellishments to issues. I was guilty, I am sure but I did try to give both sides or stay out of the topic. An example I encountered two decades ago was a university lecturer, in a lecture on social issues, suggesting and telling students where to go to protest against Pauline Hanson. The lecturer had every right to his opinion, but yo not encourage students to consider both sides of the issues she was engaged in is wrong, unethical and cheapens his standing.
I do hope your optimism is found to be well-placed. It is a shame it takes such suffering to force this revision, but, perhaps in some strange utilitarian way, if we do come through this with a better civic life, the experience may not have been in vain. It would, at least, be better than if our politicians draw on communitarian and benevolent approaches under critical duress, then abandon them for the demonstrably more problematic neo-liberal and populist approaches evident before COVID-19. Thanks, Simon, for an insightful reflection and call to action.
ReplyThis is a really important question. You are right – it is not good enough to demand little of our politicians. But at the same time, there isn’t much precedent to suggest that writing to those in power will change a rotten attitude. I hope that I am wrong. Do you think that there is scope for systematic change? I would be interested to hear your thoughts. Thank you for this piece!
Reply
Join the conversation
Can our politicians step up to the crisis?